Executive Coaching, Leadership
How Do You Handle a Brilliant Jerk?
I’ve worked on several executive coaching projects where one team member is a royal jerk. What makes someone a jerk? Here’s our definition: someone who is rude, abrasive, condescending, undermines or puts others down, is arrogant, blames others, and, in a nutshell, is difficult for multiple people to deal with. We emphasize multiple people because if only one person has difficulty dealing with this person, both may be exhibiting behaviors that are undermining their relationship.
The term “brilliant jerk” was popularized by Reed Hastings, the CEO of Netflix in his 2009 presentation, Netflix Culture: Freedom & Responsibility. In it, Hastings states: “Brilliant jerks. Some companies tolerate them. For us, the cost to effective teamwork is too high.”
Some of the specific behaviors that earn someone the reputation of being a jerk are:
- They are confidently wrong: They have a pressing need to be right… even when the whole world knows they are wrong
- They have to have the last word in every conversation
- They see issues as black or white – there’s very little room for grey
- Know the answer to everything
- Habitually complain about co-workers and customers
- Truly believe they are the smartest person in any room
- They don’t seem to be able to say, “I made a mistake,” or “I’m sorry.”
- Jump to conclusions and blame others without having all the facts
- Criticize their boss
- Strong adverse to any and all feedback for improvement
A jerk’s fallout or negative impact can devastate your team or organization. The most devastating impact is that the best people, the ones with the most options, will exercise their option to leave the company because of them. Why? They know life is too short to waste time working with a jerk. Jerks do real damage to the goals and bottom line results of your team or organization.
The question most people are asking right now is why are they still employed if all of the above is true? The biggest challenge for leaders is that the jerk is often their most productive employee. Thirty years ago, I employed a pressman who was incredibly difficult to deal with. Sometimes it was a challenge even getting him to come to work…. and to do so sober. One day I sat him down for a little bit of coaching and counseling and asked him, “Do you see these performance issues as a problem?” He looked at me and emphatically replied, “No.” When I told him I was perplexed and asked him to explain, he told me, “If you can find a better pressman than me, who can print faster and at a higher quality than I do, I want you to introduce him to me.” He had me; he could print better drunk than most pressmen could sober, even with inconsistent attendance. The problem was not his results; he used the behaviors he exhibited to the team daily to create the stellar results.
Every manager, at one point in their career, has had to deal with a brilliant jerk. We know they’re brilliant and produce strong results because if you have a jerk that’s not doing their job well, the decision is incredibly easy; you quickly fire the nonperforming jerk. It’s the smart ones, the ones producing stellar results, that make the decision incredibly difficult. If you have a brilliant jerk on your team right now, here are 7 tips for you.
Create a “No Jerks” policy: I do believe that life is way too short to work with negative people who don’t treat others with dignity and respect. You can even fire someone and exhibit so much dignity and respect that the terminated employee will thank you for the opportunity when they leave. Results are incredibly important to any team or organization. However, the way team members achieve those results, and how they interact with others, is equally important. Send the jerks to your competitors and screw up their workplace cultures. When people see that jerk behavior will not be tolerated, most team members who truly are brilliant will change quickly and align themselves with the team’s culture.
Focus on the behaviors that are undermining the individual and the team, not the individual’s attitude: Attitude describes a specific part of someone’s personality, and people will defend their personality to their death. An example of focusing on the behavior and not the attitude could sound like this: “Jenny, when we talked about implementing the new software at our team meeting yesterday, you said “this software sucks and I am not going to use it.” Focus on the behaviors that are undermining the individual and the team, not the individual’s attitude.
Ask questions, don’t tell: You can tell a jerk, but you can’t tell them much. In the examples above, you could ask the following question: “Just so I can be clear, how do you see that comment supporting me as your supervisor, or the success of our team?” There’s a good chance that the jerk doesn’t see their negative comments as a problem, and they won’t want to be told their negative comments are a problem. Asking, rather than telling, gives you the best opportunity to both understand their perspective, and lead them to discover for themselves why their attitude and resulting behaviors are a problem.
Be specific: Let the jerk know what specific behaviors you expect in the future. Let the employee know that from this point forward, if you can’t say something positive, proactive or constructive about other team members or departments we work with, don’t say anything at all. Or you could say, “When people come to you and ask for help, support, or information, I need people to describe your interaction with them as courteous, knowledgeable, friendly, and helpful.”
Calculate the true value: The jerks truly believe that they outperform everyone else and their results are worth their value at any cost. Although the jerk may outperform everyone, there is a high cost. If our best team members leave, there is a cost to replace them. When everyone is spending time talking about what a pain in the rear the jerk can be, there is a cost of wasted time and productivity. Even if the troubled team member is twice as productive as your other team members, the jerk’s benefit quickly becomes an overall expense if they cost everyone else twenty percent of their productivity.
Hold all team members accountable: All team members need to be held accountable for treating people right. When management rewards team members only because they achieved certain results, it sets a dangerous precedent that will undermine a culture where employees love to come to work. Jerks need to know, this issue is not a case of either/or. Either you get the results and treat people poorly or you treat people well, but miss the results. To be successful in today’s culture, you need both.
Provide executive coaching & training: Executive coaching and training with jerks is effective about half the time. We have coached hundreds of these jerks. Fifty percent of these difficult team members will adopt the mentality, “I can learn and I can change,” and go out and build effective relationships. The other half may change for a short time and then go back to their old habits. Effective bosses realize that the jerk is not an effective team member, fire the disruptive employee, and hire a new person who understands the importance of being a strong team player.
Effective bosses tend to tolerate brilliant jerks’ abusive behaviors and quickly destroy their team’s culture. Brilliant jerks have a desirable skill set that they bring to the table. However, when you take into account the high cost of their behavior on team morale and productivity, it doesn’t matter how talented and skilled they are; the cost of their skills is simply not worth it.
One Comment
Bill Loeber
Jerks tend to have high individual achievements, and that is how they operate in a work environment, more as loners. They see their personal achievements as the end-all and be-all. A good manager sees the team’s results in aggregate. One way to coach a “jerk” is to tell them that if they want to advance in the organization they must learn to see how they can apply their gifts so that the team performs at a higher level. This means assisting other team members where they can. Then give people feedback based on how well they help team dynamics and results. At Hewlett-Packard where I was a manager for many years when I evaluated people I always made sure to reserve the highest rankings for people that showed how they helped the TEAM do more, not just their individual productivity.