<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How Do You Handle a Brilliant Jerk?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://peterstark.com/how-do-you-handle-a-brilliant-jerk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://peterstark.com/how-do-you-handle-a-brilliant-jerk/</link>
	<description>Management Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 20:34:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://peterstark.com/how-do-you-handle-a-brilliant-jerk/#comment-27147</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2018 20:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.peterstark.com/?p=12164#comment-27147</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This does not seem to contemplate that the boss is the jerk.  Blindly supporting a supervisor that is &quot;confidently wrong&quot; does not help the company.  The negative comments can &quot;support me as your supervisor&quot; because they point out the boss&#039;s jerk attributes.  Expanding this to 360 feedback and adding things like &quot;criticize their employees&quot; would make it more symmetrical.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does not seem to contemplate that the boss is the jerk.  Blindly supporting a supervisor that is &#8220;confidently wrong&#8221; does not help the company.  The negative comments can &#8220;support me as your supervisor&#8221; because they point out the boss&#8217;s jerk attributes.  Expanding this to 360 feedback and adding things like &#8220;criticize their employees&#8221; would make it more symmetrical.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: david		</title>
		<link>https://peterstark.com/how-do-you-handle-a-brilliant-jerk/#comment-21928</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[david]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2017 13:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.peterstark.com/?p=12164#comment-21928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I teach math and engineering students and have had the misfortune of running into this type of student. I basically am going back to teach developmental education as a result. These students are quick and smart, but I don&#039;t want to be around them at all. I lack the power to flunk people because of their attitude. If you have to hire one of these people I recommend hiring them only on a consultant/contractor basis. Keep them on a part time contract that way they are at arms length. Let em get to close and they will just poop all over your organization. Use em and lose em. And I can&#039;t over emphasize the &quot;lose them&quot; part. Keeping them on as part time will cause them to resent you. I suspect this is why snowden and whats her name were contractors and not employees. But just having them as contractors can be a blow to your workers&#039; self esteem. It is like saying to your employees, hey you aren&#039;t good enough to do the job, so we have to bring in the ringers. I&#039;d say this attitude is much more prevalent in the engineering fields and much more tolerated. But, I&#039;d say a good employee over twenty years is better than a great  employee over 15 minutes. I&#039;d just stay away from them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I teach math and engineering students and have had the misfortune of running into this type of student. I basically am going back to teach developmental education as a result. These students are quick and smart, but I don&#8217;t want to be around them at all. I lack the power to flunk people because of their attitude. If you have to hire one of these people I recommend hiring them only on a consultant/contractor basis. Keep them on a part time contract that way they are at arms length. Let em get to close and they will just poop all over your organization. Use em and lose em. And I can&#8217;t over emphasize the &#8220;lose them&#8221; part. Keeping them on as part time will cause them to resent you. I suspect this is why snowden and whats her name were contractors and not employees. But just having them as contractors can be a blow to your workers&#8217; self esteem. It is like saying to your employees, hey you aren&#8217;t good enough to do the job, so we have to bring in the ringers. I&#8217;d say this attitude is much more prevalent in the engineering fields and much more tolerated. But, I&#8217;d say a good employee over twenty years is better than a great  employee over 15 minutes. I&#8217;d just stay away from them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JollyBee		</title>
		<link>https://peterstark.com/how-do-you-handle-a-brilliant-jerk/#comment-21603</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JollyBee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 07:24:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.peterstark.com/?p=12164#comment-21603</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You need these kind of people in roles requiring heaving analysis and thinking. I had them as my engineers before. But I put them in a group where their individual contribution matters more, sometimes zero teamwork needed. Most often, they are in R&#038;D or BCP roles. In times of technical crisis, they are one of the best problem solvers. They can think of out this world solution to problems.

So I do not agree with the NetFlix CEO. Every person in this world is placed here for a reason. And you are correct, it&#039;s a matter of finding their strength and aligning it where you most need it as the key to these types of people.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need these kind of people in roles requiring heaving analysis and thinking. I had them as my engineers before. But I put them in a group where their individual contribution matters more, sometimes zero teamwork needed. Most often, they are in R&amp;D or BCP roles. In times of technical crisis, they are one of the best problem solvers. They can think of out this world solution to problems.</p>
<p>So I do not agree with the NetFlix CEO. Every person in this world is placed here for a reason. And you are correct, it&#8217;s a matter of finding their strength and aligning it where you most need it as the key to these types of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
