<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Three Types of Visions	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://peterstark.com/attitude-response-change/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://peterstark.com/attitude-response-change/</link>
	<description>Management Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2015 23:36:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rationalist		</title>
		<link>https://peterstark.com/attitude-response-change/#comment-759</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rationalist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2013 18:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.peterstark.com/?p=8328#comment-759</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;It&#039;s better to be an optimist who is sometimes wrong than a pessimist who is always right.&quot;

But if an optimist is only wrong sometimes, wouldn&#039;t a pessimist be wrong most of the time as a result? 

Otherwise if the pessimist is always right, the optimist would always be wrong...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s better to be an optimist who is sometimes wrong than a pessimist who is always right.&#8221;</p>
<p>But if an optimist is only wrong sometimes, wouldn&#8217;t a pessimist be wrong most of the time as a result? </p>
<p>Otherwise if the pessimist is always right, the optimist would always be wrong&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
